Re: Investing

From: Olga Bourlin (fauxever@sprynet.com)
Date: Sat Jun 14 2003 - 22:01:48 MDT

  • Next message: Robert J. Bradbury: "Re: ENERGY: Singularity on hold?"

    From: "Eliezer S. Yudkowsky" <sentience@pobox.com>

    > Olga Bourlin wrote:
    > >
    > > What kind of evidence and how much evidence would you need? We can all
    > > find statistical evidence for investors and traders in the stock market
    > > - but that's not the point here. There *are* people who do well, so
    > > they must be doing "something right."
    >
    > Does not follow. There are people who win the lottery; it doesn't mean
    > that those people alone have discovered the secret pattern of winning
    > numbers. It means that a lot of people tried, and a few succeeded, at the
    > chance probability. Are there more investors who do well than chance
    > would lead you to expect?

    Sorry if I wasn't as clear as I could have been. Yes, that's exactly what
    I'm saying - that there are investors who do better than chance would have
    them do. The rest of my post went: "There are *techniques successful
    traders and investors use - it takes time and education and work* - but
    there are plenty of people who are doing all right (and many are doing much
    more than just all right)."

    Because this thread didn't exclude professional traders, I was thinking more
    about people who do this for a living. There are many tools available to
    professional investors (and they're the *same* tools that are available to
    any investor who wanted to learn more about the stock market and how it
    operates - Level II, Island, real time quotes on Streamer, stochastics,
    candlestick charts, and the many other sites devoted to helping investors).
    I do this for a living myself, and am still honing my skills and learning
    new things (but even more experienced traders are constantly learning new
    things).

    As a huge *side benefit,* I keep up with all kinds of interesting news, and
    the news recently has been inspiring (and profitable) indeed, especially in
    the biotech and nanotech sectors. Check out the recent -
    one-to-three-months' - percentage gains on: GERN, GENR, DNDN, TGEN, BIOM,
    ALTI, TINY, NGEN, PPHM, VECO, to name a few (most have dropped off a little
    since making their big moves due to momentum generated by promising
    research news, but are still hanging in there, and are interesting stocks to
    watch).

    FYI I have never bought a lottery ticket in my life. I have almost an
    aversion (and never entertain myself) with games of any kind - card games,
    gambling, you name it. Yech.

    Olga



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Jun 14 2003 - 22:11:21 MDT