From: Olga Bourlin (fauxever@sprynet.com)
Date: Sat May 31 2003 - 13:51:52 MDT
From: "Jef Allbright" <jef@jefallbright.net>
> Conversely, a recurring theme on the extropians list is that of extremely
> bright persons performing feats of intellectual magic but lacking the
> ability to garner support and --- accomplish --- tasks requiring more
than
> individual effort.
>
> These same persons often try to disguise their lack of effective people
> skills by projecting arrogance, use of obscure language and references,
and
> sarcasm. None of which is apparent in young Greg Smith's writings, web
> site, speech, or appearance. In my opinion, here's someone worth
watching,
> and perhaps helping.
I agree that he's worth watching.
But disagree on the "god" publicity. There are really three choices
regarding this nasty "god" business. Say (1) you believe, say (2) you don't
believe, or say (3)*nothing* - just stick to other issues. One doesn't have
to bring "god" into the equation at all. So then why do it?
At the very least, it would be helpful not to give any alleged "god(s)" any
more publicity (even if by default) by imputing that he/she/it is
responsible for the "gift of genius" or anything else. I've even heard god
being given credit for "science," of all things. That last one is really
rich ... (get serious!)
Olga
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat May 31 2003 - 14:02:57 MDT