RE: PLUTO, Our Future Home

From: Spike (spike66@attbi.com)
Date: Sat May 24 2003 - 12:18:53 MDT

  • Next message: Dehede011@aol.com: "Re: More enthusiasm than news in Fox's coverage of war"

    Robert J. Bradbury:

    On Thu, 22 May 2003 spike66@attbi.com wrote:

    > > They don't have enough water.
    >
    > Water will be practically useless for making the kinds
    > of stuff I have in mind.

    >Actually spike, perhaps not so -- ...

    >Also, so long as you keep the temperature low enough I
    >suspect that ice, perhaps reinforced with nanotubes,
    >might be a reasonable structural material (what is
    >the difference between reinforced concrete and
    >reinforced ice???).

    The vapor pressure. Water ice would need to be cold indeed
    to prevent it from being lost thru sublimation.
     
    >> Don't need atmospheres if you handle your matter
    >> correctly.

    >Not strictly true until one is uploaded.

    Well, right, but of course we as humans need not actually
    ever be uploaded to continue with my notion of Earth-origin
    intelligence bursting forth into the galaxy. It would be
    nice of course, butuploading of a meat brain is a far more
    difficult problem than building an MBrain.

    >We still need O2
    >to oxidize reduced carbon energy sources. There might be
    >ways around this but I'm not sure that our current physiology
    >would adapt to them easily.

    Ja, but I have long since scuttled the notion of very many
    humans living off this planet long term in anything much resembling
    our current form. We have faaaarrrr too many wasted atoms.

    Dont back away from it, Robert, your vision of an MBrain
    is sheer brilliance. Do maintain ownership of that idea.

    There is no need to assume we will do otherwise or colonize the
    galaxy in any other form besides an enormous flock of interdependent
    orbitting nodes. The more one thinks about it, the more inevitable
    the Bradburyesque MBrain structure becomes. spike



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat May 24 2003 - 12:27:22 MDT