Re: Reality bites

From: Spudboy100@aol.com
Date: Fri May 23 2003 - 22:44:54 MDT

  • Next message: gts: "RE: More enthusiasm than news in Fox's coverage of war"

    R. Bradbury asked:
    <<For example, if I had the means, time, energy, etc. should I
    be supporting myself or my politicians in reforming the
    building code in Algiers or the health code in Taiwan???
    Robert>>

    OK, a taxonomy of world issues relating to Extropian goals.
    Points:
    1) We can do nothing about quakes, except create better architecture that
    resists
        quakes. Detecting when quakes will happen would be a life-saver. An early
        warning system is needed. In an age of smart buildings, and
    super-materials
        (Drexler-wise), we could eliminate deaths. However this confluence of
    technologies
         may properly be 200 years off; as opposed to something more timely.

    2) Sars is a newly arisen virus, which we might be able to affect using
    anti-virals or
        other chemical reactions in the human biology. Its impact is global,
    rather then
        localized like an earthquake.

    I would say that laws or movements that hinder "responsible" research are a
    threat to Extropian goals. I would opine that laws, funding, investment that
    accelerates basic and applied research are the area to focus on, if your
    interest is specifically in furthering Extropian goals.

    My own sense of achieving Extropian goals; seems likely to be understanding
    and promoting useful areas of physics, astromomy, biology, engineering, and
    philosophy as the potential seed-grains for new ideas. This is the cheapest way
    to go, but also the longest term. No quick ROI here.



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri May 23 2003 - 22:55:01 MDT