Re: PHYSICS: our increasingly strange universe

From: Hal Finney (hal@finney.org)
Date: Thu May 22 2003 - 10:26:51 MDT

  • Next message: Charles Hixson: "Re: There's no such word as `virii'"

    Emlyn writes:

    > The very fact that we have scarcity is crazy. Why isn't our environment
    > directly manipulable; eg: why is there matter? Humans are having to go to
    > absolutely extreme lengths to make matter behave like software (not there
    > yet), when it could have been that way from the beginning.

    It's possible that such an "easy" universe would not have been suitable
    for the emergence of intelligent life.

    With so much power and flexibility, the universe might even be too
    chaotic and random to allow life itself to form. Even if life could
    begin, it would quickly evolve to exploit the "magical" potentialities
    of the universe if they could be so easily accessed. It could fill in
    the niches so well that there would be little evolutionary pressure for
    complexity and ultimately intelligence.

    It might well be that the ideal universe is not too different from what we
    see: one that allows life to form and evolve, but with enough difficulty
    that a huge number of different strategies and structures are explored;
    one that rewards intelligence with incredible powers, but sets the bar
    so high that unintelligent life cannot manipulate these potentialities;
    and one that leaves the universe mostly empty, so that once intelligent
    life does form and develop the potential to spread, it has vast rewards
    for doing so.

    One of the ideas I have played with is that the universe is likely not
    lawful. It would be expected to approximate physical laws but to have
    rare exceptions. The reasoning is that universes with simple physical
    laws are likely to be more probable than those with complex ones; but
    that the number of different universes with complex laws is greater,
    approximately cancelling this effect.

    To get life and evolution, you need relatively simple laws, so that
    the universe is predictable and structured. But there would also be
    universes with basically simple laws that also have complex exceptions -
    so called "white rabbit" universes, as the concept has been discussed
    on Wei's Everything list - universes where magic exists. The total
    collection of white rabbit universes of all forms is roughly equal in
    size to the simple ones. So we could be living in such a universe.

    Along the lines above, access to the magic cannot be too easy, or
    intelligent life cannot evolve. So the anthropic principle rules out
    those universes. That leaves those for which magic is possible, but
    only with the aid of intelligence. We might live in such a universe.

    Going forward, then, I would not be surprised if our efforts to
    create a Theory of Everything are thwarted by the discovery of rare
    exceptions. And it's possible that we could exploit these loopholes
    through technology. Or it could be that the conditions to trigger
    exceptional behavior are so rare that we never find them - the key to
    Magic forever unobtainable. Maybe our descendants will spend some of
    their vast resources constantly probing the fundamental laws, looking
    to see if there is a flaw, like a hacker searching for back doors into
    his target system.

    Hal



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu May 22 2003 - 10:38:48 MDT