From: Natasha Vita-More (natasha@natasha.cc)
Date: Wed May 21 2003 - 13:54:32 MDT
At 10:24 AM 5/21/03 -0400, Michael Wiik wrote:
>Anders Sandberg makes a handy chart:
>
>>Tech Social Economic
>> - - - Anti tech authoritarians (reactionaries)
>> - - + Anti tech conservatives (Kass, Fukyama)
>> - + - Anti tech liberals (Rifkin)
>> - + + Anti tech libertarians (small is good?)
>> + - - Pro tech authoritarians (high tech fascism,prometheans)
>> + - + Pro tech conservatives (good for business)
>> + + - Pro tech liberals (left transhumanism?)
>> + + + Pro tech libertarian ("classical" extropianism)
Good but incorrect. As much as I like Ander's work on this example, after
consulting with Max, we concur that Pro tech libertarian is not "Classical"
extropianism. It is "Early" extropianism. Very early, in fact.
Let's not confuse classical with early and certainly not label any pro tech
extropian under any one political party belief system. This in itself is
not extropian.
Natasha
Natasha Vita-More
http://www.natasha.cc
----------
President, Extropy Institute
http://www.extropy.org
Founder, Transhumanist Arts & Culture
http://www.transhuman.org
http://www.extropic-art.com
http://www.transhumanist.biz
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed May 21 2003 - 12:07:29 MDT