RE: "Hysteria, Thy Name is SARS"

From: Phil Osborn (philosborn2001@yahoo.com)
Date: Sat May 17 2003 - 14:12:28 MDT

  • Next message: Phil Osborn: "NIGERIA: Stoning of Woman"

    In response to From: Harvey Newstrom
    (mail@HarveyNewstrom.com)
    Date: Fri May 16 2003 - 07:05:14 MDT

    "Evidence, please? I don't recall gay activists
    arguing for the right to infect innocent people or try
    to kill them. Remember that I lived through
    this movement you are recalling. It would be like me
    telling a Viet Nam vet what really happened in the
    fox-holes. Do you really believe that gay
    rights advocates demanded the right to infect people
    or kill people? This seems preposterous on the face of
    it. I am certain that this story has been
    "interpreted" from a conservative commentator. I would
    sure love to see references and examine the original
    source for this."

    One of the local papers a few years ago interviewed
    local bar patrons - non-gay bars - about whether they
    would tell a sexual partner if they were HIV positive.
     Most said "No." Anecdotally, I knew a young
    Vietnamese guy who came to the U.S. in the early
    '90's, apparently related to a GI. He had been more
    or less living on the streets in Vietnam for some time
    and picked up some bad habits. Once here, he
    immediately got involved with the gangs, drug selling,
    selling stolen phone card numbers, wrecked a whole
    string of cars, knocked up a 17 yr. old Vietnamese
    girl and then, after marrying her, immediately started
    creating a string of girlfriends on the side, all of
    which he considered normal behavior.

    When the subject of AIDS and disclosure came up, his
    response: ~"Hey! I know plenty people got AIDS don't
    tell nobody, just have sex like everybody. No big
    deal." From his defensive emotional attitude at the
    time, I give a high probability to his in fact being
    HIV positive himself, which might help explain why his
    brother in law nearly beat him to death shortly
    thereafter.

    The key element here is not race, ethnicity (altho
    ethnic attitudes can certainly play a major role), or
    sexual preference (altho certain kinds of sex are
    demonstrably a lot safer than others in terms of
    disease transmission). It is the combination of
    irresponsibility and promiscouity.

    __________________________________
    Do you Yahoo!?
    The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.
    http://search.yahoo.com



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat May 17 2003 - 14:24:37 MDT