RE: [META]: Yet another idea for discussions

From: Michael Wiik (mwiik@messagenet.com)
Date: Thu May 15 2003 - 20:34:57 MDT

  • Next message: Terry W. Colvin: "//HUMER// Re: "liberal media""

    Lee Corbin writes:

    > So what category is *your* post (i.e., *this* thread) in?

    I assume pan-critical rationalism requires you to start criticizing
    immediately as you read a message, however, much writing effort could be
    saved by reading the entire post prior to responding (or at least the
    5th paragraph).

    > I'm sorry ;-) but I'm already criticizing your idea. But I
    > definitely believe that nothing should be above criticism,
    > and (as a loyal adherent of PCR) firmly contend that criticism
    > is the life blood of progress.

    Well, whatever. To me it's all design. And when I design, first I build
    up, then I take away. I design a bit beyond the requirements, so I can
    see where I can add value within the budget. I keep awareness of
    constraints, but experience teaches what issues can be bypassed in this
    phase.

    Then I begin to trim away redundancies, and extraneous material. When
    there is nothing else to take away, then I'm done. But the idea must be
    allowed time and space to grow. If I begin to take away too early, then
    I limit my possibilities. I trust my background thinking, and unless
    it's some sort of dire emergency, avoid designing and implementing on
    the same day. I 'sleep on it', and before I sleep, try to think how it
    could be different or if I've failed to see some error. Sometimes just
    the build-up can take weeks.

    How do you develop your own ideas? Do you alternate mental sentences of
    creativity with criticism? Do you find yourself constantly shooting down
    your own thoughts, before they're allowed to take flight? If not, why do
    you have the need to do so to others?

    Take a another look at your post. Is there any constructive criticism?
    Do you suggest any improvements or alternates? Or do you immediately and
    simply reject the notion we can become more productive if we structure
    our discourse a bit. Does your post do anything to extend the
    conversation, or does it just attempt to end it?

    My post had been up there for a good day. No one had responded. The
    topic was dead as far as I was concerned. Your post had no value
    whatsoever, except to demonstrate to yourself your alleged 'PCR' skills
    and stroke your own ego.

            -Mike

    -- 
    


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu May 15 2003 - 20:43:06 MDT