Re: "liberal media"

From: Dehede011@aol.com
Date: Wed May 14 2003 - 09:02:46 MDT

  • Next message: Charles Hixson: "Re: "liberal media""

    In a message dated 5/14/2003 8:18:29 AM Central Standard Time,
    mail@HarveyNewstrom.com writes: I think it is more likely that socialists and
    communists and even Nazis were probably more misguided then deliberately
    dishonest. Humans usually tend to believe in what they are doing, no matter
    how obviously wrong it seems to others. Where disagreements arise, it is
    human nature to assume the other side is deliberately being dishonest.
    "Never attribute to conspiracy that which is adequately explained by
    stupidity."

    Harvey,
           Sure, you have a very good point. Even on this list I find people
    making fundamental errors because they don't understand how our system works
    even when it is operating legally and properly.
           Even here people report the raw vote of our last Presidential election
    as if it were the total popular vote -- it was not. We count votes until the
    results cannot be changed by the remaining vote that is uncounted. The
    remaining uncounted vote is thrown away. In our last Presidential election
    it is reliably reported that millions of votes were never counted.
           My best guess is that Gore would have retained the popular lead if we
    had counted every last vote. I can't prove that. The political apparatus
    working in the polls said, "That is enough" when not enough votes remained in
    a jurisdiction to give Gore the victory in that jurisdiction.
    Ron h



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed May 14 2003 - 09:13:05 MDT