From: John K Clark (jonkc@att.net)
Date: Tue May 13 2003 - 00:54:45 MDT
Spudboy100@aol.com wrote:
>unlike chemical explosives attacks, no collateral damage.
I still don't get it. If you know exactly where the warhead is you can blow it up with a simple cruse missile, or if it's deep underground drop bunker buster bomb on it, there shouldn't be much collateral damage and it wouldn't bankrupt the world economy like a high power neutrino beam would.
John K Clark jonkc@att.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue May 13 2003 - 01:06:14 MDT