RE: "Hysteria, Thy Name is SARS"

From: Harvey Newstrom (mail@HarveyNewstrom.com)
Date: Mon May 12 2003 - 16:22:46 MDT

  • Next message: Harvey Newstrom: "RE: (IRAQ) RE: Name calling vs. Ad Hominem"

    I don't know why people are so afraid of admitting that we don't know
    everything. SARS is new. We don't know if it will spread or die out. We
    don't know if it will be easily cured or immune to all medicines. All these
    predictions on both extremes are meaningless. They are just guesses made
    without evidence. Those who say it will become an unstoppable epidemic that
    will cripple the planet may be right, but there is no evidence for that.
    Those who say this is a minor bug and won't do as much harm as existing
    pneumonias or malaria may be right, but there is no evidence of that either.
    Worse, each side attacks the other as being fear-mongerers or
    truth-suppressors. Why the vitriol? And why is each side so sure they are
    right and the other is wrong? Until there is evidence to support a
    conclusion, everybody is just guessing. None of them are right. No matter
    how this pans out, both sides are making conclusions out of thin air. They
    are both betting what they think or hope might happen, but the winner in the
    end has no superiority for correctly predicting the outcome.

    --
    Harvey Newstrom, CISSP, IAM, GSEC, IBMCP
    <www.HarveyNewstrom.com> <www.Newstaff.com>
    


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon May 12 2003 - 16:36:00 MDT