Re: (IRAQ) RE: Name calling vs. Ad Hominem

From: Dehede011@aol.com
Date: Sat May 10 2003 - 09:54:50 MDT

  • Next message: Anders Sandberg: "Re: HUMOR: Nanotechnologist lung"

    In a message dated 5/10/2003 10:37:02 AM Central Standard Time,
    mwiik@messagenet.com writes: Dyke, who is generally seen as an ally of Blair,
    admitted that he was "shocked while in the United States by how unquestioning
    the broadcast news media was during the war." He added that, while in the
    U.S., he was "amazed by how many people just came up to me and said they were
    following the war on the BBC because they no longer trusted the American
    electronic news media."

    Careful Mike,
           There are sounds coming out of England about complaints over BBC being
    so pro Sadaam. Of course we know your leanings don't we? <G> You haven't
    said a good word for the American government since Benjamin Harrison
    physically picked up John Hancock and seated him in the President's Chair at
    the Continental Congress.
           We also know of Sadaam's efforts and successes to subvert CNN's
    reporting. Since it has been exposed that he also made massive efforts to
    buy or influence other reporters or news services.
           I think a man would look at the way our own news services fouled up
    time after time from being entirely too negative and conclude that the news
    media were not overly congenial to our Army.
    Ron h.



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat May 10 2003 - 10:19:03 MDT