GM Foods Safe Enuf

From: Spudboy100@aol.com
Date: Thu May 08 2003 - 06:50:51 MDT

  • Next message: Dehede011@aol.com: "Re: [IRAQ] RE: Name Calling vs. Ad Hominem"

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/3007573.stm

    GM foods 'not harmful'

        
    By Ivan Noble
    BBC News Online science staff
        

    Britain's academy of science, the Royal Society, says there is no evidence
    that eating GM food is any more harmful than eating non-GM food.

    The UK Government is sponsoring a review of GM science

        
    The society says in a submission to the UK Government's GM review that
    although the technology could lead to "unpredicted harmful changes in the
    nutritional status of foods", the same is true of conventional crop breeding.

    It says the chances of GM crops and foods triggering allergic reactions are
    in principle no worse than the chances of non-GM plants doing the same.

    A senior member of the Royal Society attacked one environmental protest group
    for what he said was a failure to provide evidence to back up the assertion
    that GM food was dangerous.

    'Smokescreen of claims'

    "The public have a right to decide whether they want to buy GM foods, and are
    entitled to have access to sensible and informed advice, based on sound
    science.

    "It is disappointing to find a group like Greenpeace stating on its website
    that 'the risks are enormous and the consequences potentially catastrophic',
    without offering any solid reasons to support such a claim," said Professor
    Patrick Bateson, the Royal Society's Vice-President and Biological Secretary.

    "Undoubtedly some important questions need to be answered about the potential
    impact, good or bad, of GM crops on the environment.

    "But these should be addressed without a smokescreen of unfounded claims
    about their threat to human health," he said.

    Professor Bateson acknowledged that the majority of the British public was
    opposed to GM foods.

    Consumers had been frightened by unsubstantiated claims but GM developers had
    also failed to convince them that GM foods products had benefits, he said.

    'Pet technologies'

    A spokesman for Greenpeace UK rejected the attack and criticised the Royal
    Society's role in the GM debate.

    "Greenpeace commissioned and published a major report from the University of
    Wageningen on the uncertainties and unknowns around GM crops.

    "This has been submitted to the science review and it's a pity Professor
    Bateson hasn't read it.

    "But then the Royal Society are gaining a reputation as campaigners for their
    pet technologies," he said

        
        



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu May 08 2003 - 07:03:18 MDT