Re: We were wrong

From: Brett Paatsch (paatschb@optusnet.com.au)
Date: Thu May 08 2003 - 00:14:46 MDT

  • Next message: Mitchell Porter: "Re: [IRAQ] RE: Name Calling vs. Ad Hominem"

    Harvey Newstrom writes:

    > I don't know why humans have a tendency to reduce everything
    > down to absurd extremes, but we all do it. Rationally, we must
    > see the world as it really is, and realize that there are combinations
    > and subtleties.

    It was thinking about this in relation to some recent posts where the
    word "evil" was being used.

    Maybe us "homo saps" with our language and reasoning would have
    sometimes gotten ourselves into a sort of evolutionary "paralysis by
    analysis" if we'd always stopped to consider is this person or creature
    threatening me actually genuinely "evil"?

    Genuine "evil" seems, from the comfort of safety to be pretty rare, hard
    to explain intellectually and perhaps even absurd. We are all, after all
    "animals" (in part) locked into contingencies that involve resource
    competition at times. Adopting the "beyond good and evil" perspectives
    might provide useful insights for solving problems sometimes but more
    often for most of us such a detached view could merely added more to
    the chances of ending up as food. "Evil" is simple and easy and clearly
    to be avoided. Seeing predators (human or otherwise) as "evil" may
    historically haved save us enough time to stop us from becoming prey.

    Brett



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu May 08 2003 - 00:24:42 MDT