RE: Experiences with Atkins diet

From: Mike Lorrey (mlorrey@yahoo.com)
Date: Thu May 01 2003 - 21:46:05 MDT

  • Next message: Harvey Newstrom: "RE: Experiences with Atkins diet"

    --- Greg Jordan <jordan@chuma.cas.usf.edu> wrote:
    > Sterilization disrupts herd social patterns? More than violent
    > deaths? please.
    > And since you gave no reason to oppose feeding, I assume there was no
    > reason...

    I didn't feel that one was necessary because it so bloody obvious. Note
    that it wasn't *I* who defined you as an idiot.

    For the thought impaired: feeding wild animals expands their food
    supply beyond what the natural environment provides. This is generally
    done by well meaning fools who have a naive and selfish need to be able
    to view wildlife out their livingroom or kitchen window in order to
    prove to themselves:

    a) they love and care for animals so much
    b) they live in a clean and pure environment
    c) they have acheived their goal of living in harmony with nature, or
    some other such insipid tree-hugger bambi-lover blather.

    Like self-absorbed pet owners who think it is quite alright to send a
    pet to the animal shelter when their own lives get too busy to properly
    care for the pet they thought was so cute and cuddly when it was young,
    the above sort of individuals never consider that:

    a) there is nobody feeding their 'pet' wildlife when they are out of
    town
    b) there will be nobody feeding their 'pet' wildlife when they cash out
    on the appreciated value of their McMansion and move to Palm Springs.
    c) feeding wildlife creates a dependency and causes wildlife to forget
    the ability to forage for natural food sources
    d) an increased artificial food source will cause wildlife populations
    to exceed the local environments natural ability to support.
    e) concentrating wildlife in a settled area makes them a target for
    dogs and cats. When deer, for example, are chased by loose dogs in the
    dead of winter, their energy reserves are quickly exhausted and they
    die nasty deaths.
    f) concentrating wildlife near settled areas makes them more likely to
    be victimized by traffic accidents as they cross roads more often to
    seek out human provided food.
    g) when you get too busy with your life, or you go on vacation, or you
    move away, those animals are going to go without the food you provided
    and suffer accordingly. Being dependent on your munificense, they are
    no longer able to forage for themselves and are far more likely to
    become prey to weather and loose dogs.

    Unlike bambi-lovers, I demonstrate my love of deer by shooting loose
    dogs in the winter time. I don't feed the deer, and I hunt them in
    areas where their numbers are excessive for the environment.

    Those who claim they love animals but are ignorant of wildlife
    managment principles tend to come into this state from the city, buy up
    tracts of wilderness, then post them as off limits to hunting. This
    always results in large numbers of deer-car traffic accidents on roads
    bordering these properties, as the deer population is unregulated and
    explodes, forcing them to cross the roads to seek out food sources.

    These fools don't realize they cause more suffering than they prevent.

    =====
    Mike Lorrey
    "Live Free or Die, Death is not the Worst of Evils."
                                                         - Gen. John Stark
    "Pacifists are Objectively Pro-Fascist." - George Orwell
    "Treason doth never Prosper. What is the Reason?
    For if it Prosper, none Dare call it Treason..." - Ovid

    __________________________________
    Do you Yahoo!?
    The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.
    http://search.yahoo.com



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu May 01 2003 - 21:57:02 MDT