From: Harvey Newstrom (mail@HarveyNewstrom.com)
Date: Thu May 01 2003 - 10:16:15 MDT
Brian Atkins wrote,
> I absolutely knew you were going to do that when I posted the message.
> That's why I specifically asked for comments on
> that particular page instead of your opinion on
> the other pages (which I note are written by
> many other authors).
It is a waste of my time to refute every crackpot webpage that gets posted
for review. When a site obviously is full of misinformation and
pseudoscience, it is inefficient to go through and "prove" each item is
wrong. More than inefficient, it is dangerous. If I fail to prove
something wrong, I end up believing some of the pseudoscience.
> Please only respond further to this sub-thread if
> you are willing to actually discuss the page in
> question and its references.
Who deanimated and made you boss?
Why should I stand by quietly while people get duped into going to a
pseudoscience website? Why shouldn't I point out that this site is full of
misinformation and people should be careful before they start trusting this
site as a source of nutritional advice? Nutrition is dangerous enough
without people taking their information from sites like these.
-- Harvey Newstrom, CISSP, IAM, GSEC, IBMCP <www.HarveyNewstrom.com> <www.Newstaff.com>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu May 01 2003 - 10:28:50 MDT