Re: my objection to the Doomsday argument

From: Eliezer S. Yudkowsky (sentience@pobox.com)
Date: Tue Apr 29 2003 - 17:38:05 MDT

  • Next message: Keith Elis: "RE: Experiences with Atkins diet"

    Rafal Smigrodzki wrote:
    >
    > You know that half of all civilizations die at age 10 billion persons, and
    > the other half live to 10 trillion persons.
    >
    > You know that you are a sentient belonging to one of these civilizations.
    > There is a sealed envelope in front of you, containing your birth rank.
    >
    > What is the a priori probability of being in the doomed civ?
    >
    > 10e9
    > P(X)=------------- ~ 0.001
    > 10e11 + 10e9
    >
    > Your a priori probability of being doomed is small, because you know that
    > most people live in the happy majority
    >
    >
    > You open the envelope, find the number 999 999 999, and update your
    > probabilities:
    >
    > (1-.5)1/10e9
    > ----------------------------- ~ 0.99
    > (1-.5)*1/10e9 + (1-.5)*1/10e11
    >
    > Your a posteriori probability of being doomed if your birth rank is 999 999
    > 999, is 99%. Please note, that you didn't move a lightspeed from one
    > civilization to another, merely adjusted your point of view based on the
    > data that became available.

    Er... Rafal, shouldn't that be:

    > (1/10e9)*10e9
    > ----------------------------- ~ 0.5
    > (1/10e9)*10e9 + (1/10e11)*10e11

    I don't know where you're getting the (1-.5) from, since it's neither a
    prior nor a conditional probability. And the end answer is, of course,
    0.5, which corresponds to the reality that half of all people with
    birthrank 999,999,999 live in short-lived civilizations, and half live in
    long-lived civilizations.

    -- 
    Eliezer S. Yudkowsky                          http://singinst.org/
    Research Fellow, Singularity Institute for Artificial Intelligence
    


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Apr 29 2003 - 17:48:19 MDT