From: Adrian Tymes (wingcat@pacbell.net)
Date: Sun Apr 27 2003 - 13:56:10 MDT
--- spike66 <spike66@attbi.com> wrote:
> NO! Land area is too boring. I want land mass, in
> kg.
>
> Actually, I want land area too. Then we can divide
> mass by density and area and figure out how deep the
> land is.
Iroinically, you'd have to define how deep you include
in "land" to calculate this. Down to an identifiable
layer or fault? Down to the semi-solid, semi-liquid
magma? All the way down to the core? Regardless, the
depth you choose determines the volume, thus mass,
thus
density, thus volume, thus depth.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Apr 27 2003 - 14:07:34 MDT