Re: evolution and diet

From: Lee Daniel Crocker (lee@piclab.com)
Date: Wed Apr 23 2003 - 19:05:09 MDT

  • Next message: gts: "RE: evolution and diet"

    > > It's worse than that--even his imaginary story isn't really
    > > helpful. The fact is, Mr. Hugh M. Species did not do "just
    > > fine" on fish, fowl, etc. In fact, he was probably near
    > > starvation most of the time, and just managed to reproduce
    > > once or twice before dying in his twenties of disease or
    > > injury.
    >
    > You're missing the point, Lee. In those pre-medical-science times,
    > that was doing just fine.

    I'm not missing anything. Yes, of course that was "just fine" for
    him. My point is that the evidence for loss-of-health after the
    advent of agriculture is harder to interpret and far more equivocal
    than you make it out to be. There's no clear and meaningful measure
    of "health" that was good before agriculture and bad afterward,
    and no clear way to control such an analysis. There are lots of
    tantalizing data points here and there to suggest that. And there
    are lots of data points (for example, life expectancy) that were
    bad before and good after, because life before agriculture was
    pretty miserable all around. Now it's perfectly reasonably for you
    to hypothesize that most of the post-ag improvements can be
    explained away by factors other than choice of foods, and that's
    probably even true. But the data just aren't nearly as clear or
    reliable or one-sided as you make them sound.

    And even if I totally accept your choice of data and interpretations,
    it still doesn't necessarily follow that the diet serves /my/ goals,
    even if it does serve my /genes/'s goals.

    The paleo diet is a very good theory from which to come up with
    actual tests to try. And it also has another great benefit: unlike
    taking the latest popular diet craze or supplement that shows promise
    before the results are in, there's a few million years of history
    suggesting that the paleo diet is at least unlikely to be harmful, so
    it's probably safe to do it while waiting for the studies to come in.

    -- 
    Lee Daniel Crocker <lee@piclab.com> <http://www.piclab.com/lee/>
    "All inventions or works of authorship original to me, herein and past,
    are placed irrevocably in the public domain, and may be used or modified
    for any purpose, without permission, attribution, or notification."--LDC
    


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Apr 23 2003 - 19:22:13 MDT