Re: evolution and diet

From: I William Wiser (will@wiserlife.com)
Date: Wed Apr 23 2003 - 18:01:25 MDT

  • Next message: gts: "RE: evolution and diet"

    Eliezer mentioned my favorite null hypothesis. Eat what is
    most convenient and enjoyable. I have made a few changes
    so far. The Paleodiet suggests additional changes which
    means time, effort and reeducating taste buds. Paleodiets
    also conflict with some expert recommendations. It's harder
    when experts disagree. :)

    I saw a book by Loren Cordain recently. The bibliography
    looked nice. I'll look for some more rigorous literature on
    Paleodiet ideas when I get to the competing hypothesis
    part of my studies. I don't think it wise for me to endorse
    or reject the idea from what I have seen so far and if I'm
    going to look at it, I may as well go to the source. That
    ought to be about that for me but to be chatty...

    I have read in several nutrition books that calcium is
    abundant in some plants but poorly absorbed. I also recall
    a study of rural Chinese diets saying they seemed to get
    plenty of calcium from vegetables. I think researchers
    suggested that plant calcium may be poorly absorbed if you
    eat animal products. One could as easily theorize poor plant
    absorption if you eat dairy products. So, would the idea be
    that plant calcium is absorbed fine or that Paleodiets include
    a lot of plants so the poor absorption is not a problem or
    that dairy does interfere with calcium absorption from plant
    sources or that calcium is best gotten from bone marrow or
    that we don't really benefit from as much calcium as nutrition
    textbooks suggests. The main argument for dairy products
    is calcium. They are not the only source but they are a
    convenient and tasty source for many people.

    Also it's not enough for me to show that a Paleodiet is healthy
    but I would want to see that dairy is unhealthy before I gave
    up dairy. Not that dairy is unhealthy for some people but that
    dairy is unhealthy for most people (likely including me). I'm not
    so sure that nutrient density is something rewarding to optimize.
    It looks like once you get a certain level of nutrients while keeping
    your calories below a certain level the rewards level off (except
    for a few nutrients which can be supplemented). Like alcohol I
    would ask how much dairy and grain I can eat without paying a
    definite health cost. Eating more meats on the other hand I like.
    So if I can discover that meats are just as healthy as grains and
    dairy that would lower my dairy somewhat by substitution.



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Apr 23 2003 - 18:12:40 MDT