From: Harvey Newstrom (mail@HarveyNewstrom.com)
Date: Sat Apr 19 2003 - 13:26:52 MDT
gts wrote,
> > There is no "default" position or "burden-of-proof" in science.
>
> I think what you're really arguing here is that the default
> null hypothesis should be "Harvey Newstrom's personal diet
> hypothesis" or perhaps "The USDA recommended diet hypothesis"
No, I am not. Are you reading my posts? I argued against any theory being
declared the default null hypothesis without experimental proving it.
Leaving the burden of disproving your theory to others is not science.
> This is just basic Stat 101.
No it isn't. Have any of you guys actually taken Statistics or Experimental
Methods in college?
-- Harvey Newstrom, CISSP, IAM, GSEC <www.HarveyNewstrom.com>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Apr 19 2003 - 13:42:53 MDT