Re: Tech Changes Battlefield

From: spike66 (spike66@attbi.com)
Date: Fri Apr 18 2003 - 20:09:22 MDT

  • Next message: Dehede011@aol.com: "Re: The Middle east -- was a couple of other things"

    Adrian Tymes wrote:

    >>spike: Perhaps
    >>humanity is seeing the end coming for traditional
    >>battlefield tactics, which has been with us for
    >>as long as there have been humans. spike
    >
    > That may be true, and certainly there are those in the
    > Pentagon who openly say as much. But they cite the
    > improved communications technology more than the
    > upgraded weaponry. Imagine, for instance, what
    > augmented reality could give to a battlesuited soldier
    > (and they are working on battlesuits, too)...
    > *That* is a true revolution, to them.

    Ja. I am encouraged by the outcome of the latest
    conflict. Enough of the Iraqis realized that fighting
    with 30 years tech delta was hopeless and stupid, and
    so the war really didn't amount to much. Compare
    with WW1, with miles of guys in trenches attacking
    simultaneously, with horrifying results, or the
    massive bombings of WW2. Can we not extrapolate and
    realize that all traditional warfare is hopeless and
    stupid? Should not all political conflict take the
    form of economic struggle, much like the way one large
    corporation makes war on its competitors? Humanity
    is truly on the eve of construction.

    spike



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Apr 18 2003 - 20:20:05 MDT