From: spike66 (spike66@attbi.com)
Date: Wed Apr 16 2003 - 00:27:16 MDT
gts wrote:
> Spike wrote in a different thread related to diet:
>
>
>>My notion is that in general, the evolutionary
>>mechanism of mate selection leads to a number of
>>positive feedback mechanisms, whereas survival
>>selection more often leads to negative feedback
>>mechanisms.
>
>
> I'm not sure I can agree with this, spike. Judging by the fame and fortune
> of women like Marilyn Monroe, and by her marriage to the late baseball star
> Joe DiMaggio, I think it's safe to say that many modern men are inclined to
> mate with women like her. Is this going to lead to positive feedback from
> modern mate selection? I dunno. I wince when I think of what it might mean
> for the future of the human species.
>
> -gts
Hmmm, Im not sure what to make of your Marilyn Monroe
example. I think you are fearing that in modern times
the mentally deficient have a reproductive advantage
over their mentally adequate counterparts. Of this I
tend to agree, however this has little to do with the
survival of the species, for humans are currently faaaar
smarter than optimal for maximum reproduction, it would
seem.
In any case, focus on the notion of evolution having two
distinct mechanisms, survival selection and mate selection,
the latter of which may be thought of as survival selection
at the genome level. I am interested in trying to make
simulations of evolution sophisticated enough to determine
if survival selection leads to negative feedback loops
whereas mate selection leads to positive feedback loops.
If this is true, does it matter if a mating is female-
choice dominated or male-choice dominated?
Marilyn's dumbness was an act, by the way.
spike
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Apr 16 2003 - 00:37:34 MDT