Re: evolution and diet (was: FITNESS: Diet and Exercise)

From: Brian Atkins (brian@posthuman.com)
Date: Tue Apr 15 2003 - 17:33:46 MDT

  • Next message: gts: "RE: evolution by mate selection, gene manipulation"

    gts wrote:
    >
    > On the other hand I do know some paleodiet purists who are willing to risk
    > infectious disease by eating raw meat. Evidence that we are not adapted to
    > cooked meat: meat produces carcinogenic heterocyclic amines when cooked over
    > a fire. Paleodieters who prefer cooked meat (most of them) therefore try to
    > broil or boil it, or at least to cook it very slowly and lightly over a very
    > low fire so as reduce the production of heterocyclic amines.
    >

    I don't think that qualifies as evidence. Evidence as presented at the
    following URL for instance says that homo sapiens were likely cooking
    meat and otherwise using fire right when they were first evolving 125k+
    years ago.

    http://www.beyondveg.com/nicholson-w/hb/hb-interview2c.shtml#fire,%20first%20control

    Actually I still am wavering on the idea that cooked meat causes cancer.
    Many of the studies I have seen people use to claim this end up having
    problems when you look at them closely. For instance look at this
    recently reported study:

    http://www.applesforhealth.com/WomensHealth/redmeacolc4.html

    this is just a news summary, but can you spot some obvious problems with
    the conclusions?

    Here's a good page on beyondveg talking about this. It appears from a
    quick glance at the table summarizing results from one of these human
    studies that people who overcook their food actually have significantly
    lower amounts of some cancers.

    http://www.beyondveg.com/tu-j-l/raw-cooked/raw-cooked-1e.shtml

    The quote from the study authors even says that there was no
    carcinogenic effect seen. This study is just another case where people
    with their own anti-meat or anti-fat agendas selectively quote random
    figures from a study to try and bolster their case to those who won't
    dig into the real study design and results.

    Also of note at that link is a reported study by Turesky.. a quick
    Google seems to show he has done plenty of work to show that the human
    body is fully capable of breaking down/detoxifying HCAs.

    Finally, note that HCAs form primarily in cooked high-protein muscle
    tissue which has been shown to be one of the least preferred foods of
    primitive peoples available from a "fresh kill". Things like cooked
    liver, brain, or other organs have little to no HCA formation.

    -- 
    Brian Atkins
    Singularity Institute for Artificial Intelligence
    http://www.singinst.org/
    


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Apr 15 2003 - 17:41:05 MDT