RE: The first hero of the war

From: Keith Elis (hagbard@ix.netcom.com)
Date: Tue Apr 15 2003 - 08:29:54 MDT

  • Next message: Amara Graps: "RE: US Reputation (RE: Arab World Stunned by Baghdad's Fall)"

    Lee Corbin:

    ---
    "An off-list correspondent has brought to my attention that I began
    using the term "ESS" (Evolutionarily Stable Strategy) as if it were
    /wrong/ Evolutionarily Successful Strategy /wrong/.
    "ESS is a term perhaps first used by John Maynard Smith in
    his book "Evolution and the Theory of Games".  My familiarity with the
    term comes from Axelrod's work in the late eighties ---probably many of
    you are familiar with the "Tit-for-tat" results, and the issues
    concerning whether or not a society can be invaded by strangers who have
    different strategies for cooperation or defection.
    "Some time in the last five years I have began loosely using
    the term to refer to what is merely a "successful strategy"
    for a subgroup or subspecies, or a memeplex, which waxes dominant within
    its larger group.  Sorry for the confusion. The term ESS should be used
    only in the narrower sense."
    ---
    You're right. But imagine an early tribe where every individual's
    failure in the hunt was made public to the tribe. Every hunter stands to
    gain by making as big a deal as possible about the others' failures.
    However, the top 20% of hunters gain the most as they fail the least.
    The middle 60% gain when they are successful as well. But, they also
    gain when their more frequent failures are kept under wraps. The bottom
    20% has very little to gain by being open and honest about failures. If
    80% of hunters fail enough to gain from keeping failures quiet, failures
    will be kept quiet more often. This trend would vary according to
    another variable, that of reciprocity. Where keeping failures quiet is
    likely to be reciprocated, the worst hunters are much more likely to
    keep them quiet. Eventually, the percentage of failures made public
    would stabilize at the optimum for all competing skill levels.
    Reciprocal "face-saving" thus emerges. This appears to me to be worthy
    of the label 'ESS'. Perhaps I'm wrong.
    Keith
    


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Apr 15 2003 - 08:36:42 MDT