RE: IRAQ: Predictable catastrophes of human stupidity

From: Keith Elis (hagbard@ix.netcom.com)
Date: Fri Apr 11 2003 - 09:07:51 MDT

  • Next message: Randall Randall: "Re: IRAQ: Predictable catastrophes of human stupidity"

    Jay Dugger:

    > Please remember military police count as a very small
    > subset of the military proper, and even then they exist to
    > enforce discipline within the military more than to do the
    > same sort of work as civilian law enforcement.

    While it is true that a normal division-sized element has only a slice
    of military police, the rest of this statement is not true at all.
    Military police are trained in all the normal police functions, and some
    would say, since they are charged with law enforcement among armed
    troops, they are trained to deal with contingencies normal police are
    not. We're not at war most of the time and during peacetime, MPs drive
    around in Ford sedans and civilian SUVs, respond to domestic
    disturbances and set up RADAR traps like any other police force.
    Military discipline problems look a lot like civilian crime (i.e., they
    are usually the same thing). But that's not really the issue:

    > Soldiers
    > and Marines do not make very good police. They train with
    > very different tools and techniques for very different
    > ends. Expecting military servicemembers to keep order in
    > Iraq isn't reasonable.

    What special skills do police have that military troops do not? Normal
    civilian police have some rudimentary knowledge of the law codified into
    police procedure, but this can easily become military procedure in
    certain circumstances. What else? Knowledge of local customs and
    traditions can be learned. Knowledge of who the "bad guys" are comes
    with experience. The tools are different? Well, the tools must match the
    job and when the criminals carry Kalishnikovs, military tools look a lot
    more effective than tasers, billy-clubs, and the 9mm. Different
    techniques? Probably, but many police techniques are drawn directly from
    the military's tried and true combat contingencies and can essentially
    be boiled down to 'watch your flank and call for backup'. The US
    military and the militaries of other countries have been doing police
    missions in Panama, Haiti, Bosnia, Kosovo, and Afghanistan to name the
    big ones. We still have troops in Bosnia, Kosovo, and Afghanistan. These
    are almost entirely "policing" missions, with the notable exception of
    recent Afghanistan military campaigns. Kosovo and Bosnia have even
    proven to be relatively successful, no thanks to the corruption of the
    UN's police in both locations.

    What good is law enforcement when no one knows what the law is? Military
    troops with some intelligence are far more likely to restore a modicum
    of order than any police force.

    Keith



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Apr 11 2003 - 09:16:49 MDT