SARS, "Super-Pneumonia" or Super Scare?

From: matus (matus@snet.net)
Date: Thu Apr 10 2003 - 10:55:59 MDT

  • Next message: Damien Sullivan: "Re: Help with a Minimum Wage Model"

    "Super-Pneumonia" or Super Scare?
    By Michael Fumento
    Scripps Howard News Service, March 26, 2003
    Copyright 2003 Scripps Howard News Service

    from - http://www.fumento.com/disease/sars.html

    Excerpt -

    "It is the worst medical disaster I have ever seen," the Dean of Medicine at
    the Chinese University in Hong Kong told a prominent Asian newspaper. This
    irresistible quote was then shot 'round the world by other media, seeking
    desperately to hype the "mysterious killer pneumonia" or "super-pneumonia."
    But a bit of knowledge and perspective will kill this panic.

    Start with those scary tags. "Mysterious" in modern medicine usually means
    we haven't yet quite identified the cause, although it appears we have now
    done so here. What's been officially named Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome
    (SARS) appears to be one or more strains of coronavirus, commonly associated
    with colds.

    "Killer pneumonia" is practically a redundancy, since so many types of
    pneumonia (there are over 50) do kill.

    The real questions are: How lethal, how transmissible, and how treatable is
    this strain? And the answers leave no grounds for excitement, much less
    panic. Super?

    At this writing, SARS appears to have killed 49 people out of 1323 afflicted
    according to the World Health Organization, a death rate of less than four
    percent. In Hong Kong, that alleged "worst medical disaster" has killed ten
    people out of 316 known victims. But since this only takes into account
    those ill enough to seek medical help, the actual ratio of deaths to
    infections is certainly far less.

    - end excerpt



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Apr 10 2003 - 10:49:37 MDT