Re: Invitation to Laymen (was [War/Politics] Is the war legal or illegal? ...

From: Dehede011@aol.com
Date: Sat Mar 29 2003 - 19:42:42 MST

  • Next message: hubert mania: "Re: IRAQ Reasons for War (was: RE: First Announcement of the Secretary of PUKE...)"

    In a message dated 3/29/2003 8:04:31 PM Central Standard Time,
    charleshixsn@earthlink.net writes: Well, it's quite clear that 2/3 of the
    Senate didn't vote a declaration of war. Of course that's not international
    law, but to me that seems a much muddier argument.

    Charles,
           Where did the 2/3 requirement of the Senate get into the discussion?
    My copy of the Constitution uses the following language.
           Article One, section eight of the Constitution enumerates one of the
    powers of the Congress as, "To declare war, grant letters of marque and
    reprisal, and make rules concerning captures on land and water."
           If you notice the Constitution does not provide the Congress with a
    form to fill out nor any other formula to follow if it wishes to declare war.
     If they pass it and it effectively declares war that is that. I don't see
    any requirement for a 2/3 majority either. Nor do I see any requirement for
    an international approval. Can you help me with that?
    Ron h.



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Mar 29 2003 - 19:50:19 MST