Re: META: Enforcement of mandatory subject labeling

From: Eliezer S. Yudkowsky (sentience@pobox.com)
Date: Sat Mar 29 2003 - 09:07:47 MST

  • Next message: gts: "RE: [Iraq] More enthusiasm than news in Fox's coverage of war"

    Reason wrote:
    >>
    >>I move to make the inclusion of the IRAQ keyword a mandatory list rule
    >>enforceable by temporary bans on posting - i.e., anyone who posts an IRAQ
    >>message without an IRAQ keyword will be asked not to post for two
    >>days, as a gentle reminder.
    >
    > Following your logic, wouldn't that then make the problem even worse by
    > ensuring that you see only lowest of the low trash posts?

    Not for long, and hopefully I wouldn't see enough to bother me.

    Michael M. Butler wrote:
    > I vote "What?"
    >
    > I truly don't understand the rules, Eliezer. Perhaps it's just the
    > "other minds problem". Beyond that, I note that {"mandatory",
    > "enforced"} != {"asked", "gentle reminder"}. There's a semantic gap
    > there, though it's not very diplomatic to say so.

    What I mean is that Natasha or Greg Burch would swoop down and make the
    two-day ban after an unlabeled posting part of the list rules, after which
    any Extropians reader could send to someone to say: "You didn't label
    this posting as Iraq, please don't post for two days." One rule,
    distributed enforcement. The ban is for two days, and not a month or
    whatever, because it's intended as a gentle reminder - i.e., the
    presumption is that the poster just forgot to label the post, and was not
    deliberately intending to ruin anyone's day. If that doesn't work, or if
    some people ignore the two-day bans, then we can move on to enforcement of
    longer-term bans by the list owners. I.e., distributed enforcement backed
    up by moderation.

    > I *did* label _my_ most florid transgression clearly as a FLAME. Perhaps
    > you could add that keyword to your plonk list? Or is it too likely that
    > most correspondents will not be as forthcoming?

    I am not going to try and add everyone's favorite keyword to my plonk
    list, in the process losing "Damien wins award" every time someone decides
    the WAR keyword is a good idea, etc. Stick with IRAQ.

    -- 
    Eliezer S. Yudkowsky                          http://singinst.org/
    Research Fellow, Singularity Institute for Artificial Intelligence
    


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Mar 29 2003 - 09:14:53 MST