RE: dangers of P2P file sharing

From: gts (gts_2000@yahoo.com)
Date: Fri Mar 28 2003 - 12:30:25 MST

  • Next message: Spudboy100@aol.com: "Super-GUN!:Wired News"

    Alfio Puglisi wrote:

    > Yes, some P2P programs are full of spyware. But many are not.
    > Kazaa-lite, for example, is a better Kazaa without spyware.
    > Various Gnutella clients are community-based open source
    > programs, where it's difficult to hide anything malicious.

    Yes I would go with a gnutella client if I were forced to use P2P (the
    cleanest I've seen is called Swapper.NET) but my concern is not so much with
    the spyware embedded in the file sharing apps themselves... My main concern
    is the high percentage of infected files on the P2P networks and the
    security risks involved in opening up one's machine to those networks.

    > After picking up the right program, the usual rule of never
    > downloading executable programs is enough. Just search for
    > pure-data files, like mp3, avi, mpg, etc.

    Sure, but as I understand it, (correct me if I'm wrong), file and printer
    sharing must be enabled to run any kind of P2P client, including gnutella
    clients. That alone presents a security risk, even if you never swap a
    single file. Those of us running stand-alone computers have no need for file
    and printer sharing, so the risk is entirely unnecessary.

    If I were really into file sharing then I would set up a dedicated machine
    for that purpose. Any cheap second-hand computer from the classified section
    of the newspaper would perform just fine. Cheap insurance.

    -gts



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Mar 28 2003 - 12:40:45 MST