RE: state vs. insurers (was: Libertarian theory breaking down)

From: Reason (reason@exratio.com)
Date: Mon Mar 24 2003 - 20:56:21 MST

  • Next message: Rafal Smigrodzki: "RE: state vs. insurers (was: Libertarian theory breaking down)"

    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: owner-extropians@extropy.org
    > [mailto:owner-extropians@extropy.org]On Behalf Of Emlyn O'regan

    > I still don't understand how all the smaller insurers wouldn't get gobbled
    > up into a big monopoly, which then has a monopoly on violence and
    > can decide to become a defacto government. How do you protect against
    this?

    I think that you have to accept a power law distribution of size: that
    always happens in a free market. The large companies are always at risk of
    being overthrown by disruptive technologies and strategies, however. Smaller
    companies can offer products and services that the large companies can't or
    won't.

    The point at which the largest companies become a governement is the point
    at which they use force and violent coercion to eliminate competitors and
    maintain a monopoly.

    Reason
    http://www.exratio.com/



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Mar 24 2003 - 21:00:55 MST