From: Doug Thayer (d_l_thayer@yahoo.com)
Date: Sat Mar 22 2003 - 17:54:52 MST
Turkey invaded northern Iraq in 1993,1995, and 1997 (and possibly after).
See the following urls:
<http://www.onwar.com/aced/data/kilo/kurd1991.htm>
<http://burn.ucsd.edu/archives/kurd-l/1997.Jun/0011.html>
To the best of my knowledge, these three invasions (40,000 troops each
time) did not result in a single security council resolution. So much
for "the breakdown of international law". It never functioned in the
first place. I guess if Turkey can invade Iraq willy-nilly, why not
the US?
---- Doug On Sat, Mar 22, 2003 at 06:37:47AM -0500, Eliezer S. Yudkowsky wrote: > Brett Paatsch wrote: > > <snip> > > http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2003/3/22/latest/10929USandB&sec=latestnadd> > "After weeks of delay, Turkey relented and agreed to let combat aircraft > fly over its territory. At the same time, however, Turkey sent 1,000 > troops into northern Iraq, and the government said it would send more to > prevent Iraqi Kurds from creating an independent state. The United States > strongly opposes any unilateral move by Turkey into northern Iraq." > > The first results of the breakdown of international law are already > reverberating. If the US can invade Iraq any time it wants, with or > without UN permission, why shouldn't Turkey do the same? For that matter, > why shouldn't Turkey seize as many Iraqi oilfields as it can, and operate > them for the benefit of the Iraqis under its area of control? > > -- > Eliezer S. Yudkowsky http://singinst.org/ > Research Fellow, Singularity Institute for Artificial Intelligence
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Mar 22 2003 - 18:03:12 MST