Exponential difference in power

From: Max M (maxmcorp@worldonline.dk)
Date: Fri Mar 21 2003 - 02:03:15 MST

  • Next message: Max M: "Re: QUESTION: prehistoric alertness"

    I am not really shure whether I should have labelled this post as IRAQ
    or WAR. But I actually do believe it is on topic, so I didn't. Sorry if
    I choose wrong.

    I cannot help but being somewhat amazed about the difference in power of
    the Iraqi and the coalition forces. It is probably many things that
    works together here, to make this difference.

    But it seems that all the high tech weaponry developed by the US makes
    an enourmeous difference in this war.

    And amazingly enough there dosn't seem to be any efficient counter
    meassures to these hightech weapons. At least not any that the Iraqis
    have been able to get their hands on.

    Ie. with laser guided precision bombs, it would seem obvious for the
    Iraqis to put up powerfull lasers pointing anywhere else than on
    important infrastructure, so as to confuse the guided bombs.

    And naturally air superiority is paramount, so the country ought to be
    massively packed with SAM's.

    This left mo wondering if all this is caused by the fact that the
    Iraqi's has been relatively isolated, and has no modern weapons anymore,
    or simply because there is a difference in weaponry that is rising
    exponentially?

    Then it could be a glimmer of what the singularity could be like.

    It is also a clear example on why it is important that these
    technologies belong to "benign" countries. But perhaps there is some
    kind of aoutomation in this, in that the free and rich countries are
    better able to develop advanced technology?

    The joker in this, is the rising power of the individual/small state due
    to even more advanced technologies (NABC - Nano, Atomic, Bio, Chem). But
    the best way to avoid individuals/small states being angry enough to use
    NABC's as a tool of terror, is to ensure wealth, freedom and democracy
    for as many people as possible.

    Should this lead to more preemptive strikes, to ensure freedom and
    democracy?

    Should we work even harder, and take more chances, to make shure that it
    is a rich and peacefull world before the technology get's to advanced?

    -- 
    hilsen/regards Max M Rasmussen, Denmark
    http://www.futureport.dk/
    Fremtiden, videnskab, skeptiscisme og transhumanisme
    


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Mar 21 2003 - 02:09:27 MST