Re: PEACE?: Gotta love those polls!

From: Charles Hixson (charleshixsn@earthlink.net)
Date: Fri Mar 14 2003 - 15:39:38 MST

  • Next message: Anders Sandberg: "Re: smart move?"

    MaxPlumm@aol.com wrote:

    > Dehede011@aol.com wrote:
    >
    > >...
    > >Yet, I clearly remember hearing one of the attorneys working for the
    > >committee that investigated him say they did not have sufficient
    > evidence to
    > >indict him.
    > >...
    > >Ron h.
    > >
    > To which Charles Hixson responded:
    >
    > "The first relevant link I found was:
    > http://www.chron.com/content/interactive/special/watergate/tapes.html
    > There were *many* pages of others."
    >
    > I would merely suggest that this page, much like most of the other
    > "serious" news services, does its typical media best to sum up a
    > complex issue in glib unhelpful fashion. Nowhere does it illustrate
    > that Dean's testimony was full of contradictions that should have
    > called into question his ...
    > Regards,
    >
    > Max Plumm

    Every single witness (that spoke on anything I could tell about) lied
    under oath. Dean was not worse than the others. My belief as I
    observed the proceedings was they every one of them was trying to
    contain the damage. (And, of course, not be blamed themselves for their
    own crimes.) Do you think I consider the "born again witness" (Colson
    wasn't it) any more credible? If you want to assert that the evidence
    was hidden, so we can't really be sure, then I will have to agree with
    you. But when I look at who was manuvering how to hide it... I make my
    estimate of which one I believe is lying more. It was intentional on
    the part of all parties involved. There could even have been legitamate
    reasons. We can't know. After the hearing they sealed all the evidence
    and said that nobody could see it for ?? was it 300 years? Some
    rediculously long period of time, anyway. Long before then all the
    tapes will have been corroded, the papers will become too brittle to
    handle, etc. The real idea was that nobody should ever be able to find
    out legally on what the decision was really based.

    You've got to trust the government. They won't give you enough
    information to do anything else.

    -- 
    -- Charles Hixson
    Gnu software that is free,
    The best is yet to be.
    


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Mar 14 2003 - 15:46:38 MST