Re: Take your Whuffie and shove it, WAS: So who's counting?

From: Mike Lorrey (mlorrey@yahoo.com)
Date: Wed Mar 12 2003 - 21:23:47 MST

  • Next message: artillo5@cs.com: "Re: Iraq Re: PEACE?: Gotta love those polls"

    --- Lee Daniel Crocker <lee@piclab.com> wrote:
    > > (Mike Lorrey <mlorrey@yahoo.com>):
    > >
    > > Don't know if it develops in the story, but it seems to me that the
    > > whole whuffie economy is based on an enticement for people to
    > behave
    > > the way others want them to behave and not according to their own
    > true
    > > natures. It is peer to peer consensual fascism. Reminds me much of
    > the
    > > society of Brave New World.
    >
    > Seems to me you're describing good old free market capitalism: people
    > earn money only to the extent that they do things or produce things
    > others want to pay for voluntarily. Why should people be rewarded
    > for
    > acting according to their "true nature", if, for example, they are by
    > nature predators and not honest traders?

    Well, no. A predator will find a niche as a hunter. Free market
    capitalism strikes a balance between individual desires and communal
    demands. I can make 1000 gizwhats a day if that makes my life
    fulfilled, but if everyone else only wants 100 a day, I'm gonna have to
    either find something else to do with the rest of my time or else
    figure out a way to generate all the income I need to live from just
    100 a day.

    The karma market previously described takes absolutely no consideration
    for the desires of the producer and only acts as a signal of the
    desires of the consumer. It is therefore an initiation of force against
    those which produce that which the karma assignors are evaluating.

    Free market capitalism is a negotiation of the desires of both. A truly
    free market karma system would balance a rating by the author of a post
    of how fulfilling it was to write the post, to how fulfilled the
    readers were upon reading the post.

    Thus, if a writer achieves total fulfillment writing a post, and
    everybody in the reading pool achieved zero fulfillment reading it,
    there is net zero karma, just as a writer who only wrote things which
    gave total fulfillment to everyone else but none to themselves would
    achieve zero karma. You get positive karma when both sides gain
    fulfillment, and negative karma when both sides lose fulfillment.

    How you equate the value of fulfillment of the one writer to that of
    the many readers is a value judgement that is entirely subjective to
    your prejudices.

    =====
    Mike Lorrey
    "Live Free or Die, Death is not the Worst of Evils."
                                                         - Gen. John Stark
    "Pacifists are Objectively Pro-Fascist." - George Orwell
    "Treason doth never Prosper. What is the Reason?
    For if it Prosper, none Dare call it Treason..." - Ovid

    __________________________________________________
    Do you Yahoo!?
    Yahoo! Web Hosting - establish your business online
    http://webhosting.yahoo.com



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Mar 12 2003 - 21:31:26 MST