IRAQ: Meet the new UN, same as the old UN

From: Mike Lorrey (mlorrey@yahoo.com)
Date: Tue Mar 11 2003 - 09:26:06 MST

  • Next message: Dehede011@aol.com: "Re: IRAQ: Meet the new UN, same as the old UN"

    "History keeps coming back, sometimes like a bad dinner. In case
    you missed the '30s, you could experience it again last week
    watching the Security Council at the United Nations, which begins
    to bear an uncanny resemblance to the late League of Nations.
    Listening to the calm, neutral, simultaneous translation of the
    Security Council's proceedings over calm, neutral, simultaneous
    NPR, one was struck by how exactly this attempt to disarm Iraq
    paralleled the world's efforts in the 1920s to make Germany disarm
    -- in compliance with that defeated country's obligations under the
    Versailles Treaty. Both regimes swore they were complying. And
    both were engaged in purely a paper exercise. ... After all the
    speechifyin' was through, I clicked off NPR and came away with
    the distinct impression that soon enough we'll be coming over,
    and we won't be back till it's over over there. If then. Because
    we can no longer turn our backs on the world. Because we might
    have to stay -- as long as necessary. We've learned a thing or
    two since the '30s. And even since the '90s. Unlike the French,
    we remember." --Paul Greenberg

    I suppose, for symmetry, the French won't be happy unless we give Iraq
    the same 21 years to disarm that they gave Germany back then, before
    Germany finally had it and did an end run around France's
    "impenetrable" wall of border fortifications along the Maginot Line. I
    imagine that the French, being French, and therefore never learning
    from military history, think that because Iraq is not a next door
    neighbor that they are therefore immune to attack.

    I would warn them of the current calls in Britain by al Qaeda
    operatives to turn Britain into an Islamist state under Sharia Law.
    France should be getting a similar ultimatum soon.

    Maybe it's just that France LIKES to get it's embassies bombed
    'accidentally'.

    I think that it is more likely that France sees advantage in forcing
    the US to go it alone, thinking that the more the US attracts the
    negative adoration of the masses of the world, the more likely it will
    be that France can regain its alleged rightful place as the leading
    nation in the world.

    I wonder what the arab word for "Vichy" is?

    =====
    Mike Lorrey
    "Live Free or Die, Death is not the Worst of Evils."
                                                         - Gen. John Stark
    "Pacifists are Objectively Pro-Fascist." - George Orwell
    "Treason doth never Prosper. What is the Reason?
    For if it Prosper, none Dare call it Treason..." - Ovid

    __________________________________________________
    Do you Yahoo!?
    Yahoo! Web Hosting - establish your business online
    http://webhosting.yahoo.com



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Mar 11 2003 - 09:33:56 MST