Re: No Planck limit for time!???

From: gts (gts_2000@yahoo.com)
Date: Mon Mar 10 2003 - 17:20:21 MST

  • Next message: Lee Daniel Crocker: "Re: Do patents really foster innovation?"

      From: "Lee Corbin"

    >Our concepts of the early universe often involve extremely early
    >instants in the chronology of the universe, e.g., 10^-43 seconds
    >(the Planck time). A number of our conceptual troubles, it seems
    >to me, arise from insisting that the point 0 be included in our
    >discussions. Why not regard the instant of the big band itself,
    >0, as not existing?

    I haven't had any time to follow this discussion, but I see now, Lee,
    that you are coming around to the same position I argued for in the
    thread called "What caused the universe to exist?", and to which you
    objected then.

    We cannot contemplate the non-existence of the universe -- our minds are
    limited only to contemplating the non-existence of things in an existent
    universe. Mathematically speaking, this means we should not regard point
    0 in time as existent. In the beginning there was NULL time -- not quite
    the same as point 0 in time.

    -gts



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Mar 10 2003 - 17:25:57 MST