Re: Extropic Priorities

From: spike66 (spike66@attbi.com)
Date: Wed Mar 05 2003 - 09:02:46 MST

  • Next message: Ramez Naam: "RE: Extropic Priorities"

    Robert J. Bradbury wrote:

    > Thus the U.S. could eliminate the entire population of Iraq
    > (~24 million people, a one time event) and still be
    > causing significantly less "extropic" damage than
    > excess caloric consumption is doing (*each* year)...
    >
    > So, *why* the blazes is the ExI list debating IRAQ when
    > it should be debating caloric intake?...
    >
    > Robert

    Proles slaying themselves with excess sugar consumption
    are voluntary deaths. It would be a nicer world if all
    terrorists chose sugar as a weapon instead of bombs,
    flooding the wicked nations with low-cost twinkies. spike



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Mar 05 2003 - 09:08:01 MST