From: Brett Paatsch (paatschb@ocean.com.au)
Date: Sat Mar 01 2003 - 12:04:12 MST
Samantha Atkins wrote:
> What really needs to be stopped is the very idea, any legitimacy
> granted at all to the idea that it is a reasonable function of
> government, within the purview of government to wield any such
> broad powers. As long as it is excepted as legitimate there
> will always be the danger of such irresponsible massive blows.
> Do not give as fickle and dangerous a Beast as government this
> kind of power. Chain it and quickly. How? There's the rub.
How do we be *effective* within democracies? Excellent question.
We have just one vote each. But far, far more importantly, we have
in open societies the right to free speech, including free speech about
government and free speech about policy.
The right sort of knowledge can be power indeed when it is coupled
with passion and a willingness to effect policy through the prudent
exercise of the right to free speech. A precious right which generations
before us have bequeathed us with their blood. A vote is just one vote.
But knowledge is the fulcrum and free speech is the lever. With these,
even one person can move the world.
So what do you *know*? How *strong* is your fulcrum? What
will you say with your precious right to speech?R
- Brett Paatsch
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Mar 01 2003 - 12:09:13 MST