Re: weapons of mass panic

From: Spudboy100@aol.com
Date: Sat Mar 01 2003 - 01:01:52 MST

  • Next message: Samantha Atkins: "Re: [wta-talk] more stupid legislative tricks to bring on early death, disability and suffering"

    Hi Ron h
    <<Let me offer you another homely example.  There is a man named Warren
    Buffet that out of his own mind earns the kind of money that would really
    boost our goals assuming of course that we personally possessed that kind of
    wealth.  In addition we would be improving our society as a main feature of
    the Buffet method is to encourage worthy corporations (in humanistic terms)
    by investing in them.  Yet not only don't the people on this list not know
    how Mr. Buffet does what he does I have querried 3 or 4 of my accounting
    instructors (after they had discussed how to invest wisely) about Mr. Buffet
    -- they hadn't a clue.
    Ron h. >>

    Ah yes, Warren Buffet, the Prophet of the plains. There is also George Soros
    of the Soros fund. That being said, let us not ignore two counterpoints:
    1) There is also a Darwinian aspect to who becomes super rich in the Forbes
    500
        sense of the phrase. They are intelligent people who gamble correctly,
    get into a
        niche, and milk it for decades; in oil, in real estate, in government
    services,
        entertainment, marketing, etc.

    2) As Tevya, the milkman, from Fiddler on the Roof sings; "If you're rich,
    They think
        you really know." The purely American equivalent to this is the
    question: "If
        you're so smart, why ain't you rich?" Thus, connoting wealth to wisdom
    in
        covalent amounts. If this were factual, all physicists and astronomers,
        mathematicians, and biologist would be rolling in cash. Alas, this is not
    the case.

    Is Buffet, a special case of billionaire, a special intellect of human; a
    throw-forward for the species? I am too un-wise to make such a judgement. As
    to whether "we" will change, I have no confidence in. As to what we believe
    in, how we govern ourselves, how we create wealth; I would say that yes,
    these things must evolve to keep pace with change, to adapt to new
    discoveries. etc.

    Mitch



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Mar 01 2003 - 01:06:05 MST