From: Samantha Atkins (samantha@objectent.com)
Date: Sat Feb 22 2003 - 15:07:21 MST
John K Clark wrote:
> "Samantha Atkins" <samantha@objectent.com>
>
> >We had no real evidence of any "weapons program"
> >when we started this little charade. We have no real
> >evidence now.
>
> Samantha you amaze me, don't you realize how incredibly foolish that remark
> of yours will sound in less than a month? And disk drives are cheap,
> messages like that get saved.
Don't you see how incredibly foolish it is to tell me I am
incredibly foolish for making a statement based on the facts
today, a statement that you claim will be proven wrong by facts
not in evidence that you simply "believe" will turn up?
I am actually sure that some purported "facts" will turn up as
we will make sure to invent them if none actually exist. But to
date, we haven't got any facts to support the WMD claim and I
certainly believe that the administration badly wants some.
>
> >Those troops are an act of intimidation
>
> Yes, but you almost make that sound like a bad thing.
>
Intimidating a country just because you can and threatening
invasion just because you can and without cause is a VERY BAD
THING. Sorry if you can't see that.
> >Bring these people home and stop being the dead horse that is
> >Iraq.
>
> So to deal with this situation you advise no war no sanctions no inspections
> no nothing and just hope the problem will somehow go away. Sort of makes
> Jacques Chirac look like Solomon don't you think.
>
No, I would suggest some positive steps to heal the country and
its people and increase real freedom in Iraq. Do you think the
current plan of an unjustified invasion and occupation has the
mark of Solomon upon it? Really?
- samantha
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Feb 22 2003 - 15:04:05 MST