From: Spudboy100@aol.com
Date: Thu Feb 20 2003 - 23:56:52 MST
Ron h said:
<<Damien,
If you are trying to say that the US hit Sadaam first then your syntax
may or may not be good but your facts are seriously faulty.
It is easy enough to say Sadaam "may" or again that he "may not." We
don't intend to wait until he has hit the US nor until you openly agree with
us. He is going to great lengths in attempting to gain weapons with which he
can hit us or some other target. That is as far as we intend to trust this
man.
Ron h.>>
Let us cut to the chase, if we may, and re-direct the emphasis of this
thread. I say the war will occur soon any way, no matter what the protestors
say or do. I am in the pro-war camp, myself, though I cry my crocadile tears,
I see no other way out of this. Big freakin' deal right? Fair enough. Now
what will those anti-War camp do now?
*Violent protests?
*A reign of molotov cocktails ?
*Sit-ins ?
*Laying on tracks carrying military equipment ?
*A stern letter to the Times ?
*Death threats, pipe bombs ?
*Denial of service email attacks ?
*taking up arms against the American Imperialists ?
*Making common cause with the Iraqis, the Iranians,
the North Koreans?
I am curious about this. How can you compell, the US to obey your will? What
about breaking diplomatic relations, economic warfare of some sort?
As Bill Safire said in the NY Times several years ago, "Nothing is more
powerful than power.." A simple statement indeed, but one that needs to be
considered. This question should be addressed, because the war is nearly
here.
Cheerfully Yours
Mitch
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Feb 20 2003 - 23:58:50 MST