From: Technotranscendence (neptune@mars.superlink.net)
Date: Wed Feb 19 2003 - 18:47:12 MST
On Wednesday, February 19, 2003 7:59 PM Robert J. Bradbury
bradbury@aeiveos.com wrote:
> I disagree with Greg. I don't see the publicity as all that
> damaging. It clearly shows a couple of fly-by-night operators
> with agendas operating in a less-than-forthright manner.
You see that and I see that, but a less critical reader, especially one
unfamiliar with cryonics, probably would not see that.
> It was an ESPN publication and we all know how that is
> clearly the best source of high quality data.
This is true, but for many people the sports page is most of the news
they're going to absorb. So if they get a distorted view from there,
it's not like they're going to take the effort to correct it elsewhere.
Perhaps someone from this list could write a letter to the editor and
see if they'll publish it. It mgiht help to clear this matter up or at
least provide an alternate view for readers of that page.
Cheers!
Dan
http://uweb.superlink.net/neptune/
See _In Evil Hour_ reviewed at:
http://uweb.superlink.net/neptune/EvilHour.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Feb 19 2003 - 18:44:03 MST