RE: All 15 Members of the Security Council agreed to Resolution 1 441 (was Re: War with Iceland?)

From: Emlyn O'regan (oregan.emlyn@healthsolve.com.au)
Date: Tue Feb 18 2003 - 23:23:47 MST

  • Next message: Hubert Mania: "Re: META: Banning Iraq discussion"

    > Emlyn wrote:
    >
    > > Why isn't the US going to war with Iceland, immediately?
    > > I don't think that the doves [hawks?] on this list have
    > > provided any solid reasons for not going to war with Iceland.
    > > And who is any of us to say what the terrible implications of
    > > not going to war with Iceland might be? Iceland says it doesn't
    > > have any WMD, but is there proof?
    >
    Brett Paasch replied...
    > This looks a bit like a sentiment I used to share. My view had
    > <snip>

    Brett, just to clarify, is your position that the US should invade Iraq? Or
    are you merely saying that they do have a justification if they decided to
    do so?

    Emlun

    ***************************************************************************
    Confidentiality: The contents of this email are confidential and are
    intended only for the named recipient. If the reader of this e-mail is not
    the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any use, reproduction,
    disclosure or distribution of the information contained in the e-mail is
    prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please reply to us
    immediately and delete the document.
    Viruses: Any loss/damage incurred by using this material is not the sender's
    responsibility. Our entire liability will be limited to resupplying the
    material. No warranty is made that this material is free from computer virus
    or other defect.



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Feb 18 2003 - 23:25:51 MST