From: John K Clark (jonkc@att.net)
Date: Mon Feb 17 2003 - 21:24:17 MST
Me:
>>He had a massive army and after he swallowed
>>Kuwait he could have taken over Saudi Arabia in
>>just a few days if he wanted to and he certainly
>>wanted to, the only reason he didn't is fear of the
>>USA, and if he knew the president was listening
>>to advise from you he would have no fear and
>>the world would be a sadder and more dangerous
>>place today.
"Samantha Atkins" <samantha@objectent.com>
> The evidence of this massive army was doctored. Sorry if you are
> not informed of this.
100% certified grade A Baloney. The same huge army that conquered Kuwait
could have done the same thing to Saudi Arabia in a matter of days and
undoubtedly would have if not for the USA.
> Let me get this straight. Saddam is the ONLY leader who wants
> WMD? You must be kidding.
No, you do not have that straight and no, I am not kidding. What I said was
" Saddam is the only leader in the world who wants weapons of mass
destruction, invaded his neighbors twice, has a chance to control the
world's supply of oil and has actually used chemical weapons on his own
people and on others."
Sorry about your reading comprehension problem.
> We were fully behind the Iraq/Iran war if that is part of what
> you are referring to. We helped build up the military strength
> of Iraq and encouraged them.
I don't give a damn because it has no relevance regarding what the present
policy should be.
>We have used chemical weapons and have conducted
>experiements on our own citizens. Does this mean
>we should be invaded?
I don't give a damn because nobody is able to do so.
>We would like to control the world's supply of oil.
>Should we be invaded?
I don't give a damn because nobody is able to do so.
>The supposed gassing of the Kurds is actually under
>some contention as it was during the Iraq/Iran war
>and the actual gas used judging from the examination
>of the victims appeared to more likely be of the
>type employed by Iran.
I'm curious, does being a apologist for a butcher like Saddam ever make you
uncomfortable?
> Frankly, I find the US position and intentions in this matter
> thoroughly sickening and utterly reprehensible.
Yes. We've all heard you say that many many times, but I don't recall one
word of criticism about Iraq, I guess you think it's a clear cut case of
good verses evil. If so then I'm on the side of evil and proud of it.
John K Clark jonkc@att.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Feb 17 2003 - 21:29:24 MST