Re: Fuel Efficient Cars (was Oil Economics)

From: Cory Przybyla (recherchetenet@yahoo.com)
Date: Mon Feb 10 2003 - 17:37:40 MST

  • Next message: Emlyn O'regan: "RE: Parallel Universes"

    --- Mike Lorrey <mlorrey@yahoo.com> wrote:
    > It is a fact that recent studies show that 1/3 of
    > drivers responsible
    > for traffic accidents are under the influence of
    > drugs other than
    > alcohol, particularly marijuana. This mirrors the
    > similar trend in the
    > Netherlands.

    it was 6.7% in 90-91.
    http://www.netaxs.com/~sparky/policy/highway.htm

    Do you have a link to the current study that is cited
    in the anti-drug commercials (this is where you got
    the claim from, no?)? As I recall what they actually
    say is 1/3 of 'drunk drivers' were also found to have
    marijuana in their system which doesn't necessarily
    link marijuana at all, but I may have it wrong...it is
    just a commercial.

    There is this:
    http://www.drugabuse.gov/NIDA_Notes/NNVol11N1/Marijuana.html
    but it cites right along with it in the headline
    studies with lower numbers, just 32% in the shock
    trauma unit. And of course the majority had alcohol
    in their system, so while having marijuana in their
    bloodstream, they were not necessarily under the
    influence. Still can't find this study though or even
    a clear reference of the study outside of this
    government link.

    Also this:
    http://www.norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=5450

    " A 2002 review of seven separate studies involving
    7,934 drivers reported, “Crash culpability studies
    have failed to demonstrate that drivers with
    cannabinoids in the blood are significantly more
    likely than drug-free drivers to be culpable in road
    crashes.” "

    here's an Australian study from 1998 that I believe
    was the one later reported on ABC news in October
    1998:
    http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v98/n945/a08.html

    here's one that could be claimed to be slanted, but if
    anyone has paid for access to the UK sunday times,
    perhaps they may want to check the article for
    validity:
    http://www.cannabisnews.com/news/thread6717.shtml

    and another from a 1999 Toronto study: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/1999/03/990325110700.htm

    __________________________________________________
    Do you Yahoo!?
    Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
    http://mailplus.yahoo.com



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Feb 10 2003 - 17:40:03 MST