Re: Fuel Efficient Cars (was Oil Economics)

From: Rafal Smigrodzki (rms2g@virginia.edu)
Date: Sun Feb 09 2003 - 13:08:44 MST

  • Next message: Anders Sandberg: "Re: Cosmology Question"

    From: "Alfio Puglisi" <puglisi@arcetri.astro.it>
    To: <extropians@extropy.org>
    Sent: Sunday, February 09, 2003 2:07 PM
    Subject: Re: Fuel Efficient Cars (was Oil Economics)

    > On Sat, 8 Feb 2003, Rafal Smigrodzki wrote:
    >
    > >### This is such a strong argument against gas taxes: taxing gas is
    > >exchanging *human lives* for a pile of cash at the IRS.
    > >
    > >Reminds me why I so intensely distrust do-goody, green, save-the-planet
    > >gobbledygook.
    >
    > You have it the other way around: taxing gas is saving lots of human lives
    > from reduced pollution. And, as Lee said , big cars seem not to reduce the
    > average mortality rate.

    ### No, you got it backwards - it is the punishment of polluters that
    reduces pollution and saves lives. Punishing gas users is almost irrelevant
    in this context - a 50 mpg car without catalytic exhaust harms more people
    than a 15 mpg car with it, both by increased pollution and decreased safety.
    By confusing the issue of gas use with the issue of pollution you are doing
    a disservice to both of them.

    Data on survival in crashes shows that solidly-built cars do reduce
    mortality rates.

    Rafal



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Feb 09 2003 - 13:11:49 MST