Re: Getting to Space (was shuttle breaks up on re-entry

From: Max M (maxmcorp@worldonline.dk)
Date: Mon Feb 03 2003 - 03:51:44 MST

Next message: Hubert Mania: "Re: Time.com asks most dangerous country"

Previous message: Lee Corbin: "RE: Oil Economics, a (long) thought experiment"
In reply to: Technotranscendence: "Re: Getting to Space (was shuttle breaks up on re-entry"
Next in thread: Adrian Tymes: "Re: Getting to Space (was shuttle breaks up on re-entry"
Reply: Adrian Tymes: "Re: Getting to Space (was shuttle breaks up on re-entry"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Technotranscendence wrote:

> It would be nice to do a study to see
> which has been more efficient over the years -- the Shuttle or throw
> away boosters?

It is interresting to notice that none of the "commercial" space
agencies are seriously thinking of building a shuttle.

-- 
hilsen/regards Max M Rasmussen, Denmark
http://www.futureport.dk/
Fremtiden, videnskab, skeptiscisme og transhumanisme

Next message: Hubert Mania: "Re: Time.com asks most dangerous country"
Previous message: Lee Corbin: "RE: Oil Economics, a (long) thought experiment"
In reply to: Technotranscendence: "Re: Getting to Space (was shuttle breaks up on re-entry"
Next in thread: Adrian Tymes: "Re: Getting to Space (was shuttle breaks up on re-entry"
Reply: Adrian Tymes: "Re: Getting to Space (was shuttle breaks up on re-entry"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Feb 03 2003 - 03:52:10 MST