From: Max M (maxmcorp@worldonline.dk)
Date: Mon Jan 27 2003 - 00:53:48 MST
Robert J. Bradbury wrote:
> Interestingly it points out how Europeans are only
> spending $15/head on space while the U.S. is spending
> $110/head. (I can understand this -- if one is spending
> more to subsidize farmers to produce "green" farm products
> then one can't really expect there to be funds available
> for space exploration.)
I love the space program as much as the next guy. But I don't think it
is the area where reasearch money are best spend these days.
There is so much more promise in bio-, nano-tech and IT.
Then later, when we can do fully virtual designs, we can design cheap
and efficient space travel. The space programme as it is today is only
for a select few anyway. And I honestly don't think the current space
programmes will change this.
Isn't that the more sensible route to take?
-- hilsen/regards Max M Rasmussen, Denmark http://www.futureport.dk/ Fremtiden, videnskab, skeptiscisme og transhumanisme
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Feb 02 2003 - 21:26:03 MST