From: Technotranscendence (neptune@mars.superlink.net)
Date: Wed Jan 15 2003 - 17:42:37 MST
Two typos in my last post on this thread:
On Tuesday, January 14, 2003 8:12 PM Technotranscendence
neptune@mars.superlink.net wrote:
> I also believe others might be inclined
That should have went on to say that they might be inclined to read
about this subject, especially since it might be on the periphery of
their thought.
And later on:
> This is true. Once one separates form and function here, one can see
> that the changing forms of families -- or the change in which form
> predominates -- might be a bad thing.
That second sentence should read:
Once one separates form and function here, one can see that the changing
forms of families -- or the change in which form predominates -- might
NOT be a bad thing.
Note the "NOT" in there. That should have been easy to spot given the
context of the statement -- and also Horwitz's position.
I hope these typos didn't cause too much of a problem in understanding
my views here. (Of course, not many people are reading this thread, so
it probably doesn't matter much.:)
Cheers!
Dan
http://uweb.superlink.net/neptune/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Jan 21 2003 - 17:10:21 MST